You have a right to know! When you turn over your personal financial information to a loan officer, make sure you know who you are giving your information to. There are new laws regulating Mortgage Loan Brokers.
The new law, 12 CFR Part 226 (Reg Z Docket No. R-1366) (eff. April 1, 2011) states that mortgage loan originators may not receive compensation based on the interest rate or other loan terms.
The Federal Reserve Board (Board) has published final rules amending Regulation Z, which implements the Truth in Lending Act and Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act. The purpose of the final rule is to protect consumers in the mortgage market from unfair or abusive lending practices that can arise from certain loan originator compensation practices, while preserving responsible lending and sustainable homeownership. The final rule prohibits payments to loan originators, which includes mortgage brokers and loan officers, based on the terms or conditions of the transaction other than the amount of credit extended. The final rule further prohibits any person other than the consumer from paying compensation to a loan originator in a transaction where the consumer pays the loan originator directly.
The Board is also finalizing the rule that prohibits loan originators from steering consumers to consummate a loan not in their interest based on the fact that the loan originator will receive greater compensation for such loan. The final rules apply to closed-end transactions secured by a dwelling where the creditor receives a loan application on or after April 1, 2011.
Another law, SB 1137 (eff. Jan. 1, 2011 which amends Sections 10137, 10139, 10166.01, and 10166.02 and adds Section 10166.051 of the CA Business and Professions Code; Amends Sections 22104, 22107, 22109.1, 22109.4, 22112, 50002, 50141, 50144, and 50700 of the CA Financial Code) regulates mortgage loan originators and their license endorsements.
Among other provisions, this law makes it unlawful for a real estate broker to employ or compensate, directly or indirectly, any licensee for engaging in any activity for which a mortgage loan originator license endorsement is required if that licensee does not hold a mortgage loan originator license endorsement. It is a crime for a person to act as a mortgage loan originator without a license endorsement or to advertise using words indicating the person is a real estate salesperson or a mortgage loan originator without having a license or license endorsement. It also authorizes the DRE Commissioner to deny, suspend, revoke, restrict, condition, or decline to renew a mortgage loan originator license endorsement, or take other actions, after notice and opportunity for a hearing, under specified conditions. See the DRE Web page for all the details at http://www.dre.ca.gov/lic_sb36_safe.html.
In addition, this law requires a licensed finance lender or broker that employs one or more mortgage loan originators that makes residential mortgage loans to maintain a net worth of $250,000 and if only arranging but not making such loans to maintain a net worth of $50,000.
For more information visit: www.crestico.com
Buying a first home can be a daunting experience. Here are five common and costly mistakes that novice home buyers make:
1. Ignoring the costs of having a low credit score. Lower-score borrowers pay thousands of dollars in increased interest rates over the life of the loan.
2. Muddying the waters by shopping for other things before closing. Lenders continue to check credit scores right up until the time of closing. Too much shopping could cause the lender to take back the loan.
3. Scrimping on an inspection. Being surprised by the need for expensive repairs can be financially devastating.
4. Buying without contingencies. Buyers should give themselves an out if the inspection turns up problems or the bank raises the interest rates.
5. No money for insurance. Insurance can be surprisingly pricey. Buyers who don’t budget for it can face a nasty surprise.
Source: CNNMoney.com, Les Christie (04/19/2010)
Mitra Karimi
California state income tax on forgiven debt resulting from a short sale, foreclosure, or loan modification will no longer be imposed on homeowners in California. Senate Bill 401 makes California’s tax treatment of mortgage debt relief income the same as federal law. Be advised, however, that only the debt stemming from the loan secured by a "qualified principal residence," will be exempt from both federal and state income tax consequences. While the federal exemption amount is up to $2 million, the California exemption is up to $800,000 and forgiven debt up to $500,000.
Now, I know you’re thinking … what is a "Qualified principal residence." This means that only the debt incurred in connection with acquiring, constructing, or substantially improving a principal residence is the subject of this legislation. Principal residences are where you actually reside, receive mail and inhabit for all intents and purposes. This new debt forgiveness exemption will include first and second trust deeds, as well as debt incurred in connection with a refinance loan to the extent that that fund from said loan were used to payoff a previous loan that would have also qualified under Senate Bill 401’s guidelines.
These "tax breaks" are applicable to debts that are discharged from 2009 through 2012. Californians who have already filed their 2009 tax returns may claim the exemption by filing a Form 540X amendment. Taxpayers who do not qualify for the exemptions (for example, those homeowners with second or third homes and/or rental property or properties) may potentially also claim an exemption, through other provisions in the law, however.
A very important thing to note is that taxpayers who are bankrupt are exempt from debt relief income tax. This means, that they have no liability. Also, taxpayers who are insolvent and have no assets may also claim exemption from debt relief income tax to the extent their current liabilities exceed current assets.
For more information about mortgage forgiveness tax consequences, go to California Franchise Tax Board’s Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Extended webpage and the Internal Revenue Service’s Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act and Debt Cancellation webpage. The full text of Senate Bill 401 is available at www.leginfo.ca.gov. Also, remember to consult with an attorney before taking any steps that may impact your tax and/or legal liability.
In December, I wrote to you about the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives ("HAFA") program under the Home Affordable Modification Program ("HAMP"). In March 2009, President Obama introduced the Home Affordable Modification Program in connection with his Making Home Affordable ("MHA") plan. These plans and programs represented the Obama Administration’s efforts to allow borrowers who are eligible (according a specific set of standards and guidelines) to avoid foreclosure by modifying their loans to a level that is affordable and sustainable for the long-term.
Now, I write to you again to bring you some more information about this program and the potential benefits and pitfalls of this new HAFA program set to roll out in April. HAFA intends to help the homeowners that HAMP could not. Basically, if you did not qualify for assistance under HAMP, you may now use HAFA to attempt to avoid foreclosure. How? Through a short sale or Deed-In-Lieu ("DIL") of foreclosure. Seems easy enough, right? Since you can no longer pay your mortgage, the government is now incentivizing it for a buyer to come along and make an offer on your house allowing you out of your mortgage obligations while still recovering some money for the bank that owns your house. The DIL basically allows you to present a Deed to the bank in lieu of foreclosure, that means, instead of the bank foreclosing, kind of like a surrender. Now, you still lose your home, but under these circumstances, your credit will be less adversely affected and you may remain eligible to potentially purchase another home. It has been reported that of the almost 1 million borrowers who were given HAMP assistance (essentially, loan modifications) only about 67,000 (about 6.5%) were provided with a permanent solution to their problem. So that means that about 93% of the people who received loan modifications are STILL struggling with their mortgages.
HAFA is seen as a potential solution to this problem. Read the next few paragraphs and decide for yourself.
Eligibility – the eligibility requirements for HAFA are extremely similar to HAMP in that the home must be a primary owner-occupied residence with the lien originating before 2009 provided that default is reasonably foreseeable and that the owed balance is not more than $729,750 (for single family residences). Additionally, the borrower’s total monthly payment must exceeds 31% of his/her gross income.
Proponents of the program are saying that it is intended to streamline the short sale process by creating an alternative situation for homeowners that HAMP could not help (even though, technically if you were not eligible for HAMP, you probably won’t be eligible for HAFA since the requirements for eligibility are substantially similar). Also, this program is meant to streamline the process of a short sale in that it hopes to use the documentation submitted under HAMP (again running into eligibility questions) and also hopes to create an environment where short sales will be pre-approved prior to listing the property for sale.
Now, there are some benefits, as I see them, in the HAFA program. One certain benefit is that HAFA works to ensure that the homeowner is fully released from liability from their first mortgage and sometimes even their second mortgage (depending on the acceptance of initiatives). Also, HAFA will aim to standardize the short sale process, which anyone who ever tries to work with the government knows is not a small task. The Federalist nature of our government creates a lack of uniformity by its nature.
Also, HAFA will provide monetary incentives like relocation assistance for the homeowner, recoupment of loan servicer costs, and up to a $1,000 match for investors for allowing a total of up to $3,000 in short sale proceeds to be distributed to subordinate lien holders (on a one-for-three matching basis; up to 3% of the unpaid principal balance of each subordinate loan).
However, as a homeowner considering assistance through this program, there are things you should know. First, the property that is being listed can not be listed or sold to anyone that the borrower has a personal or business relationship with. The new owner can not sell the home for at least 90 days, the surrendering homeowner will have to list the forgiven debt as INCOME on his/her tax return, and the loan servicer will report to the credit reporting agencies that the mortgage was settled for less than full payment, which will have a negative impact on the homeowner’s credit score.
All in all, make sure you consult with your tax and real estate professionals when considering any major decisions with regard to your home. We are professionals and take your needs into consideration and may be able to provide you with insight and information that is not readily available to you.
